<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>validates_presence_of :purpose : JSpec - JavaScript Unit testing how it should be</title>
    <link>http://lenaherrmann.net</link>
    <language>en_US</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Lena Herrmann</description>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on JSpec - JavaScript Unit testing how it should be by Elise</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing this ! Haven&amp;#8217;t gotten round to testing my js yet (bad, I know).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:418ec13e-481f-4cf0-9f91-8752a15b73fa</guid>
      <link>http://lenaherrmann.net/2010/01/04/jspec-javascript-unit-testing-how-it-should-be#comment-24</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trackback from uberVU - social comments: Social comments and analytics for this post on JSpec - JavaScript Unit testing how it should be</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This post was mentioned on Twitter by kilaulena: I wrote a blog post about my favorite JavaScript Unit Testing framework: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/6CATqS" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://bit.ly/6CATqS&lt;/a&gt; #jspec&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:9c0d4839-c6bb-4f39-a319-18bc6d04e4a7</guid>
      <link>http://lenaherrmann.net/2010/01/04/jspec-javascript-unit-testing-how-it-should-be#trackback-25</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on JSpec - JavaScript Unit testing how it should be by Alex Wilde</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;great write-up Lena!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seems like there are no excuses left for me now to not write any JS app with BDD :)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:a2e9d702-ca10-4141-8e7a-ab99c1671523</guid>
      <link>http://lenaherrmann.net/2010/01/04/jspec-javascript-unit-testing-how-it-should-be#comment-26</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on JSpec - JavaScript Unit testing how it should be by rubyconvict</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the overview - very informative. Jspec looks very cool indeed!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:9092e733-e3f2-4701-8c2d-054527aef3ac</guid>
      <link>http://lenaherrmann.net/2010/01/04/jspec-javascript-unit-testing-how-it-should-be#comment-151</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on JSpec - JavaScript Unit testing how it should be by Ian White</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article Lena, I&amp;#8217;ve found myself writing way more JS lately, and I&amp;#8217;m hoping JSpec will help me sleep better at night&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Rhino integration is great, makes it super easy to add JSpec into my ci workflow.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:e9978d23-0dbf-4e28-834c-5f52d6cc4739</guid>
      <link>http://lenaherrmann.net/2010/01/04/jspec-javascript-unit-testing-how-it-should-be#comment-192</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
